Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1910 days newer than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 5% better in Grand Theft Auto V than FX-6100 - 110 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than FX-6100 - £29.99 vs £35.24
- Up to 21% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than FX-6100 - £0.27 vs £0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
110
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |