Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 932 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 23 than FX-6100 - 151 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Celeron G1840 Processor 2.8 GHz LGA1150 2 MB Cache Boxed CPU
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
