Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 706 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 172 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 120 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
170
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.96/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rome | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |