Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1615 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than EPYC 7282 - 318 vs 295 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
