Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 565 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Iris Pro Graphics 580 - 40 vs 36 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
28%
Texel Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
