Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 380 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 380 is 75 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 380 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 380
- Performs up to 26% better in World of Tanks than Iris Pro Graphics 580 - 135 vs 107 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
62%
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
31.04 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
108.6 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 970 MHz |
| 950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
