Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 516 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 15 vs 19 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 142% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Iris Pro Graphics 580 - 80 vs 33 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
System-Shared | Type | DDR3 |
System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |