Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260 is 623 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Iris Pro Graphics 580 - 63 vs 58 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |