Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 580 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 490 days older than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 15 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 82% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Iris Pro Graphics 580 - 51 vs 28 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
13%
Texel Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
38%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
