Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1918 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 44 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 454 vs 404 FPS
- Up to 96% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $62.32 vs $1542.08
- Up to 96% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.15 vs $4.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 58 vs 145 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,711.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
454
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |