Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 2003 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 44 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 163 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 94% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $94.96 vs $1542.08
- Up to 94% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.65 vs $10.90 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,711.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €105.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 6 |
44 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |