Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1472 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 12% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 272 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $265.72 vs $1711.71
- Up to 86% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.98 vs $7.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 105 vs 145 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €1,711.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7197 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€265.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €265.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7198 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 12 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |