Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1836 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 44 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 166 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $129.56 vs $1711.71
- Up to 93% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.78 vs $10.90 per FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,711.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7149 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €129.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7150 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 10 |
44 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |