Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 985 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 44 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil Village than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 304 vs 298 FPS
- Up to 93% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $114.41 vs $1711.71
- Up to 93% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.38 vs $5.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €1,711.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7185 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
304
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €114.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7186 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |