Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1836 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Metro Exodus than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 152 vs 143 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $219.10 vs $1542.08
- Up to 87% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1.60 vs $11.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,711.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €243.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |