Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2548 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 209 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $316.68 vs $1166.95
- Up to 74% better value when playing Control than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1.68 vs $6.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900K - 44 vs 32 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€351.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €351.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 22 |
32 | Threads | 44 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |