Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1472 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 18% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 785 vs 665 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $219.35 vs $1166.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.31 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 105 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 44 vs 24 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
785
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €243.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 22 |
24 | Threads | 44 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |