Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 1987 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 188 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 91% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $109.31 vs $1166.95
- Up to 91% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.65 vs $7.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 44 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 22 |
16 | Threads | 44 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |