Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1836 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 62% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 170 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 91% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $107.34 vs $1166.95
- Up to 94% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.7 vs $12.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 44 vs 16 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€119.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €119.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 22 |
16 | Threads | 44 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |