Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1836 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 853 vs 665 FPS
- Up to 82% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $209.86 vs $1166.95
- Up to 86% better value when playing Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.27 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 44 vs 24 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
853
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€232.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €232.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 22 |
24 | Threads | 44 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |