Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2272 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 164 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $145.5 vs $1166.95
- Up to 89% better value when playing Dead Space than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.98 vs $8.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 44 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raphael | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 22 |
12 | Threads | 44 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |