Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3683 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of FX-4130
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $68.18 vs $159.89
- Up to 50% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 5 7600X - $0.15 vs $0.30 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Tanks than FX-4130 - 587 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €75.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for €177.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4130 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |