Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2992 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of FX-4130
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - $75.68 vs $158.51
- Up to 35% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 7 5800X - $0.71 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 36% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-4130 - 145 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €75.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7271 minutes ago
Buy for €158.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7272 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4130 | vs | Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |