Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2992 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of FX-4130
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $68.18 vs $96.18
- Up to 14% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 5600X - $0.32 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 22% better in Ready or Not than FX-4130 - 285 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €75.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Buy for €106.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4130 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |