Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3356 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of FX-4130
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $68.18 vs $140.39
- Up to 50% better value when playing Control than Core i5-12600K - $0.38 vs $0.76 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than FX-4130 - 206 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €75.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 284 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
50%
Price, €
€155.83
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €155.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4130 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |