Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3356 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of FX-4130
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $68.18 vs $230.09
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 540% better in League of Legends than FX-4130 - 339 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 48% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-4130 - $0.75 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €75.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
339
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.4
29%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4130 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |