Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4068 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of FX-4130
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $68.18 vs $338.95
- Up to 74% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900KF - $0.69 vs $2.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Elden Ring than FX-4130 - 141 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €75.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
26%
Price, €
€376.23
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4130 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |