Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 915 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-7300 - 179 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $84.68 vs $88.78
- Up to 10% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-7300 - $0.47 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €88.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7084 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7085 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7300 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |