Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Core i3-7300
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $88.78 vs $341.19
- Up to 65% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.45 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 51 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 35% better in Dota 2 than Core i3-7300 - 268 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
198
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7031 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
268
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
35%
Price, €
€341.19
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €341.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7031 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7300 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |