Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Core i3-7300
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $79.98 vs $259.70
- Up to 63% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-13700K - $0.22 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-7300 - 486 vs 408 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
408
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
486
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
37%
Price, €
€288.27
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7300 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |