Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1402 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Core i3-7300
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $88.78 vs $108.01
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 23% better in Starfield than Core i3-7300 - 69 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-7300 - $1.57 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €88.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6783 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
69
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.01
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €108.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6784 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7300 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |