Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Core i3-7300
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $88.78 vs $765.76
- Up to 87% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-13400F - $0.38 vs $2.85 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-7300 - 269 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
234
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7030 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
269
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
13%
Price, €
€765.76
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7030 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7300 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |