Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Core i3-7300
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $79.98 vs $104.94
- Up to 10% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.26 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-7300 - 399 vs 344 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
344
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Buy for €116.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7300 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |