Buy on Amazon
€195.09
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 67% better in War Thunder than Celeron G4900 - 230 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €60.24 vs €195.09
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Prozessor 6 Kerne bis zu 4,9 GHz entsperrt LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipsatz) 125W
Buy for €195.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74243 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
28.179322964318388%
Multi-Core
1051
12.250845086839957%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
