Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1620 - 128 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - €20.16 vs €68.52
- Up to 67% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-6100 - €0.18 vs €0.54 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 374 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
115
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 373 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |