Buy on Amazon
€216.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 5 1600 - 258 vs 254 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €66.58 vs €216.77
- Up to 69% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-10320 - €0.26 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
30.952380952380953%
Price, €
€216.77
30%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (Basistakt: 3,80GHZ; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110320 Black
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
254
98.44961240310077%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.58
100%
Value Winner
AMD CPU Ryzen 5 1600 AM4
Buy for €66.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1068
69.39571150097466%
Multi-Core
4578
98.96238651102465%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
