Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 109 vs 102 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €101.54 vs €199.5
- Up to 45% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10320 - €1.0 vs €1.83 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3592 minutes ago
Buy for €101.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3593 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |