Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10320 - 629 vs 575 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €101.9 vs €199.5
- Up to 54% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10320 - €0.16 vs €0.35 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8145 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
629
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |