Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-4690K - 160 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €89.07 vs €199.5
- Up to 55% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-10320 - €0.56 vs €1.25 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18619 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
158
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18620 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 88 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |