Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF and the more expensive Core i3-10320 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10320 - 181 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €126.31 vs €216.77
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Buy for €126.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
91.28113879003558%
Multi-Core
4626
67.83985921689397%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |