Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1765 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-6700 - 134 vs 130 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €157.91 vs €199.5
- Up to 19% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10320 - €1.21 vs €1.49 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10975 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
130
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |