Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 760 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-9500T - 164 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500T - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500T
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €169.99 vs €203.44
- Up to 14% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10320 - €1.07 vs €1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
86%
Price, €
€203.44
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €203.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2367 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
FPS
159
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€169.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2367 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-9500T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |