Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 1348 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-10320 - 206 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €184.9 vs €216.77
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Buy for €184.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
79.86507524649714%
Multi-Core
4626
45.056978669523716%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |