Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1155 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 1700X - 123 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €104.97 vs €216.77
- Up to 49% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-10320 - €0.89 vs €1.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
50.56818181818182%
Price, €
€216.77
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
118
95.9349593495935%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €104.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |