Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-2600S - 176 vs 168 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €75.84 vs €199.5
- Up to 60% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10320 - €0.45 vs €1.13 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
168
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €75.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |