Buy on Amazon
€199.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 16% better in Dirt 5 than Athlon 3000G - 187 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €69.0 vs €199.5
- Up to 60% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-10320 - €0.43 vs €1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i3-10320 (Basistakt: 3,80GHZ; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110320 Black
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16497 minutes ago
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16498 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
