Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 159 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €70.56 vs €349.99
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €70.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75399 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
158
99.37106918238993%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€349.99
20%
Buy for €349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |