Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 669 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - €73.77 vs €384.12
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 7900 - €0.56 vs €2.42 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105F - 159 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Buy for €384.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |