Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - €70.51 vs €284.63
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-12500 - €0.43 vs €1.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10105F - 179 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11178 minutes ago
Buy for €284.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |