Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €74.02 vs €327.69
- Up to 67% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €0.2 vs €0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 48% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-10105F - 550 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
371
67%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
550
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
33%
Price, €
€327.69
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €327.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |